Bit of a strange review this one.
I've had only two of those 'average' reviews, and 397 excellent, 5-star reviews.
I'm not sure what the reviewer means by the "constant" rules.
Before we begin I ask people to 1) stay close because it adds atmosphere, makes it easier to show photos, saves my throat, and means we don't block the pavement 2) not take photos while I'm talking and 3) not to go on the internet while I'm doing the actual tour.
The thing about those suggestions is that they just make the tour better for everyone.
As for plugging 'Bloody London', I mention it for 30 seconds during a TWO HOUR tour, and then at the end. Probably 3000 of the 9000 copies sold have been at the end of the Tour. I wrote it, It's had fantastic reviews, I'm proud of it. I mean, should I not mention it?
As for "asking lots of questions", I'm puzzled. Would the reviewer prefer to be talked at for two hours with no interactivity? I am genuinely fascinated by peoples opinions - again, is that a bad thing?
I ask a few questions because I'm fascinated by the answers and I like to engage, plus, as I say on the Tour, peoples answers will help me select articles for a serial killer website I'm planning. The reviewer's interpretation comes across as jaded and cynical.
The website will be about serial killers and the people coming on the Tour are the very people likely to go to the website.
Would the reviewer like me to not ask peoples opinions on a few things, so I know which subjects to write about, and instead blindly publish articles that don't interest people as much?
I love the last 2 lines though, especially because I don't think of myself as a "great actor"!
Declan